Trustworthy media intelligence isn't a checkbox. It's an engineering discipline.

Every claim in an AGENTPR™ brief carries a confidence label so analysts and decision-makers can weigh it appropriately:

Each brief also shows source attribution per claim, the full list of sources read, and the list of items filtered out (and why). If you can't trace it, we don't ship it.

AGENTPR™ is an analyst-augmentation system, not an autonomous decision-maker. The platform automatically flags a brief for human review when any of the following are detected:

• Low overall confidence on a key claim
• Sarcasm or irony risk in sentiment classification
• Cultural-nuance ambiguity (idiom, code-switching, region-specific framing)
• Crisis or reputation-risk indicators above threshold
• Conflicting signals between sentiment, emotion, and intent classifiers

Flagged briefs are paused for analyst sign-off before they're shared with clients or executives. Human judgement remains the final layer.

Full detail — including legal basis, regional storage, and your rights — lives in our Privacy Policy.

If you spot a brief that's wrong, biased, or unsafe, tell us. Every report is reviewed by a human and used to improve the methodology and guardrails.

Please include the brief ID (if available), the specific claim, and what you believe is incorrect.

Glassbox AI is the principle that any AI system shaping public narrative must be inspectable — sources, methodology, and decisions visible end to end.